3 Factors That Most Impact Worker Outcomes

March 21, 2017 by

same old thinking - same old results graphicIt’s been two weeks since the WCRI Conference recently held in Boston. I’m Michael Stack with Amaxx and today I want to give you some highlights and recap from that recent conference, from the notes that I took and the perspective that I had on it. The second session was about worker outcomes and what impacts, based on studies and research to define the best outcome.

What are those factors that we can address? For me, this was the most interesting and impactful session for what I do, which is work with employers, insurance brokers and educating best in class programs. This session is one that I found extraordinarily valuable to get an understanding of, what are those things that impact the outcomes that we can address at the beginning a claim and make sure our success is that much more likely.

Single Biggest Factor That Impacts Claim Outcome

This is a study I’ve quoted a number of times. It was published by WCRI a few years back and they came out with a study and said, “The biggest single factor based on their research that impacts the outcome of that claim is trust.” The biggest single factor that outcome impacts the outcome of a claim, is the amount of trust between an employee and an employer. Hugely important point. Hugely important factor to understand. Now, we’ve seen that one before.

How Does Supervisor Respond to Injury?

Glen Pransky from Liberty Mutual gave a presentation about some of their research and their studies. I found it extraordinarily interesting and valuable. Here’s what they came up with. Two different things that impact their outcomes, one of the biggest factors, all things being equal, if how does the supervisor respond to the injured worker at the moment that claim is reported. I’m going to say that again. How does the supervisor respond to the injured worker at the moment that that claim is reported. Do they respond with blame and anger and frustration? Continue reading 3 Factors That Most Impact Worker Outcomes

Stories Warning of Dehydration Dangers Don’t Hold Water

headshot:  Mary Chris Jaklevic Mary Chris JaklevicMary Chris Jaklevic is a freelance health reporter and regular contributor to HealthNewsReview.org.
She tweets as @mcjaklevic.

Human beings are naturally equipped with a system to regulate fluid intake. It’s thirst, and it works pretty well for the vast majority of us. Still, some news organizations are oddly compelled to remind us to drink more water. In the process, they often propagate ideas that aren’t supported by data.

hand shaking hand made of waterTake this recent USA Today story entitled, “Why you should drink water first thing every day.” It quoted two registered dietitians, identified as representatives of the American Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, who advised starting the day with two glasses of water to aid metabolism and digestion.

One of the dietitians acknowledged she hasn’t seen studies to support this, but says it does make “biochemical sense.” The other is asserted: “After being asleep all night, we wake up every day slightly dehydrated.”

Similarly, TIME sounded the dehydration alarm last year in a piece entitled “Why Hillary Clinton (And You) Should Be Drinking Water Regularly.” It blamed the candidate’s wobbly condition at a 9/11 ceremony on dehydration, a notion put forth by Clinton’s husband, just before her doctor revealed that Clinton had been diagnosed with pneumonia.

Sketchy data and claims that are all wet

While the dehydration story may have been a smoke screen, TIME nevertheless rallied on to assert that Clinton is far from alone in her failure to drink enough fluids, citing another news outlet: “In 2013, CBS reported that some 75% of Americans may be functioning in a chronic state of dehydration, many mistaking the symptoms for other illnesses.” TIME advised: “Drink plenty of water!” Continue reading Stories Warning of Dehydration Dangers Don’t Hold Water

Headline vs. study: boxes for your baby, blueberries for your brain

Michael Joyce writes for HealthNewsReview.org and tweets as @mlmjoyce

Headline vs. Study story graphicWe continue our regular series looking for clear and compelling disconnects between what a headline highlights, and what the referenced study is really about.

As you will see below, this past month ended up to be a smorgasbord of food and nutrition stories. Not surprising really. Time and time again we’ve found this to be a genre of health stories prone to misinformation. What tends to happen is the limits of observational studies aren’t made clear, “superfoods” are coronated without solid evidence, and conflicts of interest are everywhere. If you could only read one of the huge number of stories we’ve written on this topic try this one by Alan Cassels. It makes the point very clearly.

Since our last look at headlines versus studies in February we’ve published 18 news story reviews and 15 news release reviews. Here’s what we found.


News STORY report card: 4 of 18 (22%) headlines overstate study evidence (we list two examples below)

Headline: Eating more — or less — of ten foods may cut risk of early death.

Study: The study found an association between intake of 10 types of food and mortality from heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and stroke. “May cut risk of death” is a cause-and-effect leap that this study simply can’t support. The results confirmed previous studies showing that too much salt, processed meats, and sugar … as well as too little whole grains, fruits and vegetables … are all associated with mortality from these diseases.

Our review: This is predominantly an observational study. The NPR piece employed click bait language like saying certain foods “can help raise or lower the risk of death.” This is grossly misleading because it implies these foods directly impact mortality. It should have been made clear this is just a statistical association.

[READ FULL STORY HERE]

Telemedicine – A Primer

By |

illustration of telemedicineIt’s among the hottest topics in work comp these days.

Telemedicine will be one of – if not the – most disruptive force in workers’ compensation medical care. Companies such as CHC Telehealth, Go2Care, and AmericanWell are moving rapidly, adopting different business models in an effort to gain first mover advantage.

Looking for a broader perspective, I recently had the chance to interview Jonathan Linkous, CEO of the American Telemedicine Association. Here’s what he had to say…

MCM – What service types/specialties are embracing telemedicine most rapidly?  Why those?

JL – It covers the gamut from primary care to urgent care, but there are some popular specialties – mental health, behavioral health, neurology – stroke care, ICU/CCU. Dermatology is one of the earlier adopters and radiology via remote reading of images has become a standard in the industry

The greatest increase in the number of services has been via consultations with online providers, Intensive Care monitoring either continuously or in evening hours (30% of ICU beds are hooked up to remote monitoring) and remote monitoring of chronic care.

Slower adopters include surgery, although that is changing with some robotics and oversight/proctoring from specialists from a distance.

[Telemedicine is now being used for] Initial or follow-up visits with providers. Online consults are growing quite significantly with 1.2 million services delivered to 750,000 members in 2016. Possible stroke victims are being assessed by neurologists remotely today.

In terms of the largest number of people served, the top specialty is radiology where 7 – 10 million pictures are read remotely followed by cardiology with remote monitoring.

Continue reading Telemedicine – A Primer

Should The U.S. Government Buy A Drug Company To Save Money?

David Higginbotham contracted hepatitis C more than 35 years ago. He’d like to rid his body of the virus, but Colorado’s Medicaid program says he’s not sick enough to justify the cost.

And he’s not alone.

Since 2013, when Gilead Sciences Inc. released Sovaldi, the first medication that can reliably cure hepatitis C, health insurers and state Medicaid programs have been coming up with ways to limit access to it and a sister drug, Harvoni, because they’re priced so high — more than $80,000 for a 12-week course of Sovaldi at the outset.

Both drugs are produced by Gilead, and their price has dropped some, as competitors have hit the market, but Higginbotham still hasn’t been able to get the cure.

Gilead isn’t the only company that produces expensive drugs. Prices for prescription medications for various conditions have been rising faster than inflation for years.

President Donald Trump says the pharmaceutical industry is “getting away with murder,” and he’s vowed to do something about it.

So what could he do in the case of hepatitis C medications?

One solution that’s been proposed is to buy the company. Specifically buy Gilead Sciences Inc.

Dr. Peter Bach, the director of health policy and outcomes at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, says the U.S. government could save money and treat everyone in the nation who has hepatitis C if it bought Gilead Sciences, rather than just buying Gilead’s products.

Hepatitis C kills more Americans than any other infectious disease, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and it leads to a liver transplant more often than any other condition.

A year after Gilead got FDA approval for Sovaldi, it launched Harvoni, — a combination medicine that includes Sovaldi’s key ingredient and a second medication that attacks the hepatitis C virus in a different way. Sovaldi and Harvoni are the first drugs to consistently eradicate the virus, which has infected an estimated 2.7 to 3.3 million people in the U.S.

[READ FULL STORY HERE]

Safety Shoes – Selecting the Right Workplace Shoe

By

safety shoe sign
Spring fashion season is here!

What better day to discuss this topic than “Shoe the World Day?” There are multiple factors to consider when selecting the most appropriate foot protection.

The goal is to make sure that your feet are comfortable, supported, and protected. In a recent post, we demonstrated that a pair of safety shoes is an effective piece of personal protective equipment.

However, the hazards are not only falling objects or fork trucks rolling over toes, but discomfort due to improper fit and selection. Choosing the appropriate safety shoe could prevent foot related problems like bunions, corns, calluses, hammertoes, and even prevent discomfort to the legs, hips, and back.

Consider these tips when selecting your next pair.

  1. Safety should be the initial consideration when selecting the correct pair of protective footwear. There are many options in the market but you should choose a pair that will protect your feet from the hazards present. A combination of safety toe caps, metatarsal guards (protection for the top of the foot), steel plate soles (puncture resistant), sole material (slip resistance, electrical insulation, flexibility, and hardness), and overall construction materials used should be considered.
  2. Fit is very important! Did you know that the human foot actually grows during the day and shrinks while you sleep? While that’s not entirely true, everyone’s feet are slightly larger after a hard day’s work. This means the end of the day is the best time to try on a new pair of shoes or boots. Making sure your new shoes fit well is key to preventing future discomfort. About one-third of adult men are wearing shoes that don’t fit properly, so take the time to ensure you are selecting the proper size.
  3. Comfort is a must! The majority of quality safety shoes and boots will not stretch or need a break in period. Make sure that when you’re test driving potential footwear, your feet are immediately comfortable. Areas of comfort include appropriate space in the toe box, no pinching or cramping at the ball of the foot or toe area, and adequate support in the arch and heel. Make sure the padding and materials used are adequate for your work climate. Utilizing a shoe with moisture control technology for both warm and cold climates is a great option, but can affect how your shoe fits. When feet are comfortable, your knees, hips, and lower back are better aligned and supported.

    [READ FULL STORY HERE]

3 Steps to Discover the Root Cause of Work Injury

March 13, 2017 by Michael B. Stack

Why Why Why graphicA near miss may be the best thing that ever happens at your company. Depending on what you do afterward, it can be a huge opportunity to save money and headaches.

After the initial ‘phew!’ reaction, it’s time to get down to business and find out what happened and why and, most importantly, what you can do to prevent a recurrence that could result in an injury and comp claim the next time.

Fact is, most (probably all) workplace accidents have multiple causes. Even the seemingly simple-to-explain incident likely has several underlying factors going on. By getting to the real root of the problem you can avoid potentially costly and preventable claims.

Root Cause Analysis

Delving into the true causes of workplace injuries requires a team effort, though it doesn’t need to be all that complicated. There are a variety of frameworks for ‘root cause analyses.’  There are templates to make it easier to organize the information. Some organizations use a fishbone diagram to group causes into major categories to identify variation sources. Whatever system is used, there are several keys to successful root cause analysis.

Do NOT assign blame!
This is the most important aspect in getting to the real root of a problem. It’s tempting to blame someone, punish him, and move on, but that doesn’t fix the underlying problems. Root cause analysis must be done without any finger pointing. Remember, most workplace accidents are the result of a confluence of contributing factors. The job of RCA is to identify and correct them.

Ask questions.
Then ask more. And a few more after that. The main questions to ask: WHY? You may feel like a 2-year-old asking ‘why, why, why’ – but this is key to getting to the crux of the analysis. As an example, let’s say “Fred” fell off a ladder and, luckily, was not seriously injured. It might be easy to say, ‘well, Fred was being careless, he was in too much of a hurry, so it’s his fault.’ But asking ‘why’ will uncover important details that would prevent future such incidents. The answer to the first ‘why’ could be that one of the rungs on the ladder broke. ‘Why,’ you ask again, and find out it could not hold Fred’s weight. Continue reading 3 Steps to Discover the Root Cause of Work Injury

Study Says PT as Effective as Surgery for CTS

By

EDITORS NOTE:  Fortunately for our patients, we have one the finest Physical Therapists in the Santa Maria Valley, Ed Donahue!

info graphic of how to avoid carpal tunnel computer workSacramento, CA – Physical therapy is as effective as surgery in treating carpal tunnel syndrome, according to a new study published in the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®).

Researchers in Spain and the United States report that one year following treatment, patients with carpal tunnel syndrome who received physical therapy achieved results comparable to outcomes for patients who had surgery for this condition. Further, physical therapy patients saw faster improvements at the one-month mark than did patients treated surgically.

Carpal tunnel syndrome causes pain, numbness, and weakness in the wrist and hand. Nearly half of all work-related injuries are linked to this syndrome, which can result from repetitive movements. Although surgery may be considered when the symptoms are severe, more than a third of patients do not return to work within eight weeks after an operation for carpal tunnel syndrome.

The study demonstrates that physical therapy – and particularly a combination of manual therapy of the neck and median nerve and stretching exercises – may be preferable to surgery, certainly as a starting point for treatment.

“Conservative treatment may be an intervention option for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome as a first line of management prior to or instead of surgery,” says lead author César Fernández de las Peñas, PT, PhD, DMSc, with the Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation, and Physical Medicine at Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.

[READ FULL STORY HERE]

4 Urine Drug Testing Questions To Deliver Better Work Comp Outcomes

By ReduceYourWorkersComp.com 03/09/2017

DOT screening via computer
Central Coast IndustrialCare gets DOT results in as little as 15 minutes

Urine drug testing (UDT) is one of the more controversial and misunderstood tools in the workers’ comp system. While medical guidelines support the tests for injured workers who are prescribed opioids, stories of over testing injured workers —and overcharging payers — abound. There are also questions about what type of testing to use, the frequency of the tests, and what to do with the results.

UDT used judiciously and paired with clinical expertise can be invaluable in ensuring injured workers get the right medications at the right time. Understanding some of the basics will help you get the best bang for your UDT buck.

Types of testing

 •  Forensic. UDT has been around for decades, beginning with its use to identify illicit drug users in criminal and civil proceedings as well as the workplace. This forensic, or ‘gotcha!’ model is designed to determine yes or no that someone is taking certain, typically illegal drugs. An initial screening — presumptive — test is performed and any positive results are sent for confirmation.

The types of tests include in-office point of care. Results from these tests can come in minutes. However, they are not necessarily designed to detect the use of medications at therapeutic doses, something critical in a clinical setting. Also, the tests are not available for all drugs, such as synthetic drugs of abuse. Since oxycodone is a semi-synthetic opioid, it may not always be detected in these tests.
•  Clinical. This model puts the focus on the patient-provider relationship and is used as part of patient care in various settings, including pain management. The idea here is to identify the presence of specific prescribed medications, non-prescribed medications and illicit substances to benefit the therapeutic goals of the patient.

Definitive testing, typically used in this model, provides information about specific drugs and metabolites and can detect drugs at much lower concentrations, which presumptive tests do not. The results of these tests, however, may not be available for 24 hours or more.

The type of test used for an injured worker depends on a variety of factors, including the physician’s assessment of the patient’s risk. The types of medications also has a bearing on the most appropriate tests. If there are multiple opioids, for example, presumptive tests may not provide enough information to help the physician.

Why Test:

Guidelines published for prescribing opioids to injured workers support the use of UDT to help identify safe and effective treatment options.  Some of the reasons to undertake UDT include:

[READ FULL STORY HERE]

Watch Evidence: Hitting Yourself Does Not Equal A Workers Comp Claim

March 3, 2017 by Kori Shafer-Stack

Vdieo security footage fraudulent workers' comp claimFlorida’s Department of Financial Services’ Division of Investigative and Forensic Services (DIFS) recently announced the arrest of Sheyla Veronica White following her attempt to fraudulently collect workers compensation payments following an alleged on-the-job injury.

Claimed Sprinkle Head Fell From Ceiling and Struck Head

White claimed that a sprinkler head fell from the ceiling, bounced off her desk, and struck her in the head. Her employer, Cinque Terre Energy Partners, LLC promptly filed a compensation claim related to the alleged injury. Video surveillance footage later proved a different series of events surrounding the alleged injury.

Cinque Terre’s insurance company, AmTrust North America, grew suspicious of White’s claim and referred the incident to the Division of Investigative and Forensic Services for review and possible investigation. As part of their subsequent investigation, DIFS detectives requested video footage from Cinque Terre’s security cameras, which confirmed AmTrust’s suspicions that the claim was fraudulent.

The video clearly shows a piece of a sprinkler head falling onto White’s desk, but it does not bounce and strike her in the head as she alleged. Instead, the video shows White picking up the broken item, looking around to ensure she was alone in the room, and then striking herself in the head with the item. Watch video here.

Arrested and Transported to Jail

White was arrested and transported to the Broward County Jail. She faces two counts of workers comp fraud, and faces up to five years in prison if convicted.

[READ FULL STORY HERE]